City of Norwalk
Board of Education
Finance Committee
December 9, 2009
ATTENDANCE: Steve Colarossi, Chair; Glenn
Iannaccone, Susan Hamilton,
Jack
Chiaramonte (7:32 p.m.)
STAFF: Dr. Dan Cook, Tony
Daddona, Fay Ruotolo
OTHERS: Mary Budrawich, NPS Early
Childhood Instructional
Specialist;
Betsy Bain, Early Childhood Council Chair; Jody
Bishop-Pullan, Board of Education Member; Bruce
Mellion,
NFT President; Bob McCain, Nathan Hale Middle School
Principal; Rosa Murray, Moina Noor
CALL TO ORDER
Mr. Colarossi called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Pledge of Allegiance
Mr. Colarossi then led those present in reciting Pledge of
Allegiance.
Introduction of Members
He then called roll and announced that a quorum was present.
Mr. Colarossi explained that he had discovered that the
Expulsion Officers not only protect the District, but also the students. He said that the Officer has been very
creative in terms of working with the students and that the parents were
generally pleased with him.
Mr. Chiaramonte joined
the meeting at 7:32 p.m.
Dr. Cook then updated the Committee about the travel time
expenses. He noted that he would be attaching his report to the November set of
minutes. He said that Sullivan and Shone
was charging $600 per round trip from Hartford.
Bertram and Moses does not charge for travel and the charges only start
accruing when the attorney enters the District offices. Sullivan and Shone handles everything but
special education. The bulk of the time
is negotiations. Mr. Daddona said that
they also handled the OCR and teacher complaints. Mr. Colarossi asked if the other services
could be flat rated. After a brief discussion, it was the consensus of the
Committee that a draft RFP should be created for the Committee to review and
possibly recommend to the Board. Mr.
Colarossi then asked when this could be done.
Dr. Cook explained that he thought that by the end of January after the
budget is presented, the draft RFP could be reviewed by the Finance
Committee.
Mr. Colarossi asked if there were any comments from any of
the non Board members. Mr. Daddona asked
if the RFP would also cover the Special Ed services. Mr. Colarossi said that he felt that only one
portion of this project should be handled at a time.
Ms. Bishop-Pullan asked how the Board would be informed
about this. She said she that was concerned about this. Ms. Hamilton then suggested that Mr.
Colarossi inform the full Board during the report section of the meeting.
Mr. Mellion commented that it might be important to break
the charges down into the component parts.
Ms. Bishop-Pullan pointed out that there were only a few law
firms that dealt with educational specialties when this started. Ms. Ruotolo said that there are a few more
firms in Connecticut but they are not as large as the current two firms.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 23, 2009
** MR. IANNACCONE
MOVED THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 23, 2009.
** MS. HAMILTON
SECONDED.
The following corrections were noted:
Page 1, under STAFF: please include “Fay Ruotolo”
Page 1, under OTHERS:
please replace the following:
OTHERS: Jody
Bishop-Pullan, Board member; Carol
Marianaccio,
NPS; Dr. Lynn Moore, West Rocks
Principal;
Richard Fuller, Donna Patchen, NPS; Mr.
Noor,
Kim Graham, Kathy Lesko, Bruce Mellion,
NFT
President
WITH:
OTHERS: Jody
Bishop-Pullan, BOE Board member; Carol
Marianaccio,
NPS; Dr. Lynne Moore, West Rocks
Principal;
Donna Vaccarella, NPS; Bruce Mellion,
NFT
President; Farhan Memom, Richard Fuller
Kim
Graham, Kathy Lesko
Page 3, under Corrections, please change the following from:
Page 1, HEADER:
Please change the following from:
Board
of Education
Finance
Committee
Regular
Meeting
October
22, 2009
TO:
Board
of Education
Finance
Committee
Regular
Meeting
HELD
AT ROWAYTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
October
22, 2009
Page 8, under Discussion of the Possibility of Providing 1
Bus for the Norwalk Students (60 Students) Attend the Rogers Magnet School in
Stamford, for 2010-11 and Possibility that the Transportation is Grant Funded,
paragraph 2, line 4, please change the following from: “but they wished to see
if “ to: “but they wished to see if they could get transportation.”
Page 8, under Discussion of the Possibility of Providing 1 Bus
for the Norwalk Students (60 Students) Attend the Rogers Magnet School in
Stamford, for 2010-11 and Possibility that the Transportation is Grant Funded,
paragraph 3, line 1: please change “was legal required” to “was legally
required”
Ms. Murray asked what the definition of the “OTHER” category was. It was explained that the “OTHER” category contained the names of
people who were in attendance at the meeting and addressed the Committee or
Board, but were not members of the staff or committee. FOI regulations forbids the secretary from
taking attendance of those members of the public who are in attendance at a
meeting but do not address the Committee or Board.
** MS. HAMILTON MOVED
TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 23, 2009 AS AMENDED.
** MR. IANNACCONE
SECONDED.
** THE MOTION PASSED
WITH THREE IN FAVOR (COLAROSSI, IANNACCONE AND HAMILTON) AND ONE ABSTENTION
(CHIARAMONTE).
Review of Staffing needs in
the Early Childhood Education Program and the Brighter Futures Summer Program
Mr. Colarossi said that there were concerns about the
funding for staffing needs for the Early Childhood program. Mr. Daddona explained that Ms. Budrawich
would be retiring and that her position provides the foundation for many
students’ education in the City. The
Early Childhood Instructional Specialist works with many of the City agencies.
Ms. Budrawich said that the instructional specialist focuses on the best
practices in the field. It behooves the
school district to work with the providers of early childhood education. Funding was allocated in 1997 to focus on the
early childhood education. The Early
Childhood Council looks at the broader picture of what the public school’s role
is along with the role of early childhood providers. Not every accredited early childhood program
receives School Readiness funding, just the ones that apply and meet the
criteria. She said that it is important
that the Council continues to help to coordinate the various programs.
Ms. Budrawich then distributed copies of a proposal for the
Early Childhood Council program. She reiterated that this document was a draft
proposal. She said that Norwalk has worked very hard for the last twelve years
to establish a good Early Childhood program.
Ms. Budrawich directed the Committee member’s attention to
then page that had a listing of the staff responsibilities and the amount of
time the various tasks consumed. Ms.
Budrawich then displayed a copy of the Early Childhood Plan. She emphasized that this also was tentative
and just a proposal.
Mr. Colarossi then said that there were a few inclusion
classrooms in Norwalk and asked if they were part of the program. Ms. Budrawich said that those particular
classrooms were not included in the program.
She said that she was involved in work at Brookside and with the
Brighter Futures program. Mr. Colarossi
then asked about the various grant management strategies. Ms. Budrawich directed everyone’s attention
to the third page of her handout. She
said that there was a proposal for a position that was mandated by the School
Readiness Grant.
The discussion then moved to the position that had been
previously handled by the Director of Youth Services. Ms. Budrawich said that the two positions
that will remain are the Instructional Specialist for Early Childhood and the
School Readiness Assistant. The
Coordinator’s position and the position of the Early Childhood Program Manager
have been restructured. Ms. Budrawich
indicated that unless the new position is approved, the Brighter Futures
program and the Brookside program would end when she retired.
Ms. Budrawich said that there has already been positive
interest expressed during discussions with the Coastal Fairfield County United
Way, and the Children’s Foundation about the Early Childhood programs.
Mr. Colarossi then asked how the fees were collected at
Brookside. Ms. Budrawich said that she
collects the fees because she did not want the staff to be responsible for the
money, and explained that there were privacy issues since there is a sliding fee
scale. The instructional specialist
should be a leadership position. The
restructuring would provide for the program to take the next step.
Mr. Colarossi then asked if there would be classroom space
for these programs and how the various schools would accommodate the
programs. Ms. Budrawich said that it
depends on how much the individual school wants to contribute towards the
program.
Ms. Bain pointed out that one of the reasons that Norwalk
was being viewed as a major success was because it has been able to establish a
public/private partnership. It has
consolidated what was part time attention into full time programs. She said that as the staff turns over, it is
important that a system is left behind that can continue on. Mr. Daddona said that as if the District can
expand the program, it would be good.
However, the study that is being done is very important because the
program needs space, but also needs the staff and structure, too. There is also the special Ed component for
early education. Mr. Colarossi asked if
the inclusion classrooms were part time. Mr. Daddona said that this was so.
Mr. Colarossi asked about the chain of authority in the
schools. Mr. Daddona replied that if the
program is located in any given school, it would be under control of the
principal for that school, but frequently, the principals will look to the
instructional specialist for advice and direction. Ms. Budrawich explained that because the
Early Childhood program is different, the systems are not in place. She gave an
example of the difficulty in finding substitute teachers or paraprofessional
when a staff member is ill because of the qualifications necessary for the
Early Childhood programs.
Ms. Budrawich said that there was an urgency in terms of
submitting the proposal for the RFP to the State. This means that the proper management must be
in place. By February, Brighter Futures
needs to have the final budget, the recruitment and the student selection
done. Mr. Iannaccone asked if the
funding was the issue. Ms. Budrawich
explained that the flat funding would have an impact.
Mr. Mellion said that the top circle on the first page is
where the closing of the achievement gap would be accomplished. He encouraged everyone to visit Brookside to
see the program. He said that it would be a very important thing to keep the
program moving forward.
Ms. Bain said that the instructional specialist position was
important because it is important to continue the public/private
partnership. Mr. Colarossi asked if this
could be included in the budge. Dr. Cook
said that he works closely with Mr. Daddona on this.
Review Literacy Specialist
Program
Mr. Daddona reminded everyone that last year, all the
funding for literacy specialists had been cut.
The District was able to pay for a .5 literacy specialist out of the
Priority Schools funding in all the schools.
The District was able to recommend that the Title One schools provide
for the other .5 literacy specialist position out of their Title One funding
for their facility. Mr. Daddona said
that while he would like to have a full time literacy specialist in all the
schools. The District needs to have 12
full time literacy specialists.
The discussion then moved to the definition of “literacy
specialists” and “literacy coaches” and whether or not the assigned literacy
specialists were providing enough support.
Mr. Colarossi then had several detailed questions about the grant
guidelines.
When Mr. Colarossi asked, Mr. Daddona said that the CAPT
scores needed improvement. He then said that there had been a major effort to
consolidate the curriculum to address the problem. Mr. Daddona said that it was very important
to capture the students who have difficulty reading in elementary or middle
schools. He said that having all the
middle schools using the same curriculum would be critical. By buying a site license for the reading
program, it could be made available to all the Norwalk students.
Ms. Murray asked about how the dollars were allocated for
the program and why the District was not consistent across the Board. Mr. Daddona said that the principals chooses
to use the program. Sometimes, the PTOs
help with the funding for the programs.
The current charges for one particular program are around $690 per seat. A site license would cost $395 per seat. Mr. McCain then explained that the particular
program came out with a new Web based curriculum. He said that a school might have 20 seats and
this means that twenty students from that particular school could be on the
program at any given time. The
Ms. Murray expressed concerns about the fact that certain
schools would have the program available due to finances. Mr. Daddona said that last year, the District
had pooled resources for Study Island, which the District made available to all
the schools. That particular program helped with the CAPT scores. He said that he was not ready to purchase the
program for all the schools until there were some feedback reports. The discussion then moved to how to purchase
the program for all the schools without supplanting the program with federal
funding.
Ms. Murray said that her issue was equity and that the Board
worked hard to make sure that all the schools had equity. She said that this was the kind of thing that
feeds quietly into the inequity issue.
Mr. Mellion said that Mr. Daddona had referred to funding
issues. He said that he could speak
about staffing. He pointed out that two years ago, there were 18 literacy
specialists and then the literacy specialists were cut to 12. Following that, the model changed. The second aspect is the size of the high
school classes because it becomes difficult due to lack of resources. He went on to speak about delivering the
programs and how equity is created. He
gave an overview of how the teachers perceive the issue.
Review any Post-employment
Benefit Obligations
Mr. Colarossi then asked Dr. Cook about this issue. Dr. Cook said that if the District cuts
positions, it did not eliminate all the employee position costs.
Ms. Ruotolo said that when positions were eliminated, some
of the employees ended up on unemployment.
The State recently extended the unemployment period. Also for those employees who chose to extend
their health insurance, the District is responsible for 65% of the monthly
health premium. Most of the positions
that were eliminated last year will have their benefits terminate on December
31st. Mr. Colarossi said that for every job position that was eliminated, it would
cost the District about $500 per week.
The employee is now entitled to about 46 weeks of unemployment. Ms. Ruotolo said that there had been a
concerted effort to contain the post-retirement benefits.
Discussion about 2009-2010
budget-projected shortfalls, if any
Dr. Cook said that currently, there have been no major
deficits identified in any of the current accounts. The claims in the health insurance for the
first four months of the year have been reviewed and the account is in better
shape than it was last year. A great
deal depends on what happens in the next eight months. The budget will be
tracked monthly.
Dr. Cook reported that there had been a major power failure
in South Norwalk and two schools were without power and heat. Communications and the handling of this went
well.
Regarding the elementary facility study, there were five
certified architects that were identified.
The RFPs are being evaluated. A
short list will be presented to the committee and the committee will be able to
interview the candidates.
HIRING FREEZE – IS THIS PRACTICAL
Mr. Colarossi asked what the current open positions were.
Dr. Cook said that his positions was an interim position and Ms. Vacarella also
has an interim position, along with the Superintendent. Ms. Ruotolo then listed the various job
positions that were open and the remaining positions that were currently filled
by interims.
Mr. Colarossi asked about the IT position. Ms. Ruotolo said that there were some serious
candidates and explained that it was a NASA position, which is governed by the
salary steps.
Mr. Colarossi asked about Coordinator of Health Services and
a brief discussion then followed.
The discussion then moved to the status of the various
interim job positions. Ms. Ruotolo then
reviewed all the details associated with the positions. Ms. Ruotolo pointed out that filling all
these positions would take months, but the staff needs to work on the budget
and other issues, also. There is a plan
to have the parents and others involved, also. Ms. Ruotolo said that she had attempted
to put together a training packet for the parents. She then asked if there could be some
outreach from the Board to the public.
Ms. Ruotolo commented that there were several questions and concerns
expressed from candidates as to whether their job positions would survive the
budget process.
Next BOE Finance Committee
meeting: January 7th, 2010, 7:30 p.m., Room A-330
ADJOURNMENT
** MR. IANNACCONE
MOVED TO ADJOURN.
** MS. HAMILTON
SECONDED.
** THE MOTION PASSED
UNANIMOUSLY.
The meeting adjourned at 9:14 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon L. Soltes
Telesco Secretarial Services